1. Longer registration time for new varieties
One of the main consequences of the PRM legislation is that new varieties must be registered on a national variety list before they can be tested or sold. As a result, this process can take up to two years, making it challenging for seed companies to conduct large-scale trials and fully assess the potential of a new variety.
2. Restrictions on trials and production before registration
In addition, exemptions for testing and producing new varieties while awaiting registration will be limited. This makes it harder to respond quickly to market demand, particularly in terms of specific resistance to diseases or pests. There is also a chance that a variety may ultimately not be approved, forcing seed companies to reconsider their strategies.
3. Sustainability criteria for variety registration
Another key consequence of the PRM legislation is the potential introduction of new sustainability criteria. Since these criteria are part of the European Green Deal, the exact requirements and assessment methods remain unclear. This increases the risk that a variety may not meet the minimum standards, which could delay the introduction of new varieties.
4. Pressure on testing facilities
Furthermore, the limitations on exemptions for testing and selling new varieties will increase the demand for V(C)SU testing facilities. Seed companies rely on national registration authorities’ decisions, and testing delays could postpone market introduction of new varieties by months, significantly affecting company revenues.
5. Uncertainty makes assessing further impact difficult
The PRM legislation still contains many uncertainties, particularly regarding the precise formulation of conditions and exemptions. For example, what exactly is meant by “marketing,” and how is “trial seed” defined? These details are crucial for seed companies. If new varieties cannot be tested or sold before they are registered, the introduction process will face significant delays.
